Showing posts with label internal dialogue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internal dialogue. Show all posts

Monday, April 7, 2025

Formating Internal Dialog

 QUESTION: 

I have query about the correct way to convey internal thoughts and sounds.


According to the Chicago Manual of Style:  "11.47 Unspoken discourse: Thought, imagined dialogue, and other interior discourse may be enclosed in quotation marks or not, according to the context or the writer’s preference."


I gather whether quotation marks are used and which type varies from publishing house to publishing house. Is that correct?


ANSWER: 


The only times I’ve ever seen quotation marks used for interior dialogue in popular fiction is along the lines of -- 


“Brilliant move,” I said silently to myself.  


The standard method is to italicize the thought--  


The bell slipped out of my fingers and clanged loudly as it hit the floor.  I winced. Brilliant move, Byerly.


Some publishers, particularly of nonfiction, will state the stylebook they prefer, but most fiction publishers don’t.  In the case of no stylebook mentioned, use grammar correctly and be consistent.



QUESTION CONTINUED: 


In deep third POV, it’s quite common to have a fair amount of interior dialogue.


I try to ask myself whether the person is posing themselves a specific question or stating some fact to themselves. If they are, I put them in italics, otherwise I don’t. Is this the best way to do it? 


What if they ask themselves a rhetorical question?



ANSWER: 


You seem to have a firm grip on where you italicize sentences.   For rhetorical sentences, either way would work.  


I tend to avoid italicized internal dialogue because it breaks the reader’s rhythm, particularly if it’s done too much or too little.  Instead, I write so that I remain deep in POV.


For example, to remove the internal dialogue of my earlier example, I’d write: 


The bell slipped out of my fingers and clanged loudly as it hit the floor.  I winced at my clumsiness.  


QUESTION CONTINUED: 


I also have problems with the verb’s tense in internal discourse.  


She loosened her grip, so the rope slid through her hands and let her feet slide over the knot. Shit – rope burn. Her feet reached another knot. She clung to the rope, her body shaking, her palms sweating so hard they felt cold. This wasn’t working.


Should the last bit be This isn’t working.?


ANSWER: 


If  “This isn’t/wasn’t working” is deep POV, the sentence would use “wasn’t.”  If it’s internal dialogue, use “isn’t.”  


If you’re confused about the tense, pretend the internal dialogue is regular dialogue and speak it aloud to see if it sounds right. 


If it’s a thought, the tense remains the same as the rest of the narrative.


QUESTION CONTINUED:  


If you’re trying to signify there is a sound made, does it go inside single or double quotes or can you use italics? 


ANSWER: 


If the sound isn’t dialogue by a human or other living creature, it is italicized.


The cow said, “Moo,” and its bell went clank.  


Monday, January 15, 2024

Formatting Interiors

 QUESTION:  I have a query about the correct way to convey internal thoughts and sounds.

According to the Chicago Manual of Style:  "11.47 Unspoken discourse: Thought, imagined dialogue, and other interior discourse may be enclosed in quotation marks or not, according to the context or the writer’s preference."


I gather whether quotation marks are used and which type varies from publishing house to publishing house. Is that correct?


The only times I’ve ever seen quotation marks used for interior dialogue in popular fiction is along the lines of -- 


“Brilliant move,” I said silently to myself.  


The standard method is to italicize the thought--  


The bell slipped out of my fingers and clanged loudly as it hit the floor.  I winced. Brilliant move, Byerly.


Some publishers, particularly of nonfiction, will state the stylebook they prefer, but most fiction publishers don’t.  In the case of no stylebook mentioned, use grammar correctly and be consistent.


In deep third POV, it’s quite common to have a fair amount of interior dialogue.


I ask myself whether the person is asking themselves a specific question or stating some fact to themselves. If they are asking a specific question, I put the question in italics; otherwise, I don’t.


I tend to avoid italicized internal dialogue because it breaks the reader’s rhythm, particularly if it’s done too much or too little.  Instead, I write so that I remain deep in POV.


For example, to remove the internal dialogue of my earlier example, I’d write: 


The bell slipped out of my fingers and clanged loudly as hit the floor.  I winced at my clumsiness.  


QUESTION CONTINUED:  I also have problems with the verb’s tense in internal discourse.  


She loosened her grip, so the rope slid through her hands and let her feet slide over the knot. Shit – rope burn. Her feet reached another knot. She clung to the rope, her body shaking, her palms sweating so hard they felt cold. This wasn’t working.


Should the last bit be This isn’t working?



ANSWER:  If  “This isn’t/wasn’t working” is deep POV, the sentence would use “wasn’t.”  If it’s internal dialogue, use “isn’t.”  


If you’re confused about the tense, pretend the internal dialogue is regular dialogue and speak it aloud to see if it sounds right. 


If it’s a thought, the tense remains the same as the rest of the narrative.


QUESTION CONTINUED:  If you’re trying to signify there is a sound made, does it go inside single or double quotes or can you use italics? 


ANSWER:  If the sound isn’t dialogue by a human or other living creature, it is italicized.


The cow said, “Moo,” and its bell went clank.  

Monday, January 8, 2024

No One to Talk to

 Last week, I wrote a post on characters having conversations with themselves so I thought I’d talk about similar situations in my own writing.

In my novel, STAR-CROSSED, my hero has no one but the heroine to talk to in the first part of the novel.  To cover topics he wouldn’t discuss with her, I didn't want lots of internal monologue or flashbacks which tend to be boring.  


What I ended up doing was letting him have imaginary conversations with his best friend.  Since he was also stuck in one place, I put these conversations at interesting locations from their shared past that showed more about the hero and his past.


The first conversation, for example, was in a bar on a Wild West style planet after the two friends rescued a sweet young thing during a bar fight.  The two characters shared a beer, talked a bit about the good ol' days, and the hero spilled his guts about what was bothering him.  


At other times, the best friend was the devil's advocate for one side of a choice that the hero was trying to make.  


If you do something like this, it needn't be as elaborate as an entire scene.  It can just be the mental presence of someone whose opinion the character either values or can't escape. Most of us, for example, can hear our mom or dad in our head reminding us to do or not do something.  


I’ve also had a character talk things out aloud to a horse he was grooming or a cat she was stroking.  The animal’s actions, as if commenting with a purr, a snort, or the shake of the head, gave a nice light touch as well as making the scene more interesting than internal dialogue.


If you want the hero himself as the other character, you should choose some aspect of him you want to emphasize. Say Dr. Indiana Jones--the scholar versus Indiana Jones--the adventurer.


Set up the use of the mental dialogue/scene fairly early in the novel or story so that the important scene when the character finally must make the big decision won't make the reader go "huh?" when the other side of his personality or an imaginary character shows up to discuss the matter.


In other words, have the mental character show up a few times so the hero can tell his other side to shut up or whatever.

Monday, January 1, 2024

Internal Dialog

QUESTION:  I am trying to write a dialogue scene in which a character is arguing with himself yet it seems that there are two distinct persons talking, almost as if the good side of him is arguing with the bad side.  What is a good way to show this?

You could do it like regular dialogue between two people.  The "real" character could give his better self some kind of snarky nickname which you could use as a dialogue tag.


Jon sneered as his other self.  "Why don't you shut up, Angel Fart. I stopped believing in virtue and nobility years ago."


"If you stopped believing, why am I here?"


Or you could do it like normal internal monologue but with the good Jon’s comments underlined/italics.


Jon fought to ignore his inner voice.  He knew what he had to do, and he'd do it.  He'd stopped believing in doing the right thing years ago.


If you stopped believing, why can you hear me?