Monday, September 21, 2026

Hot, Warm, and Cold Viewpoint

 QUESTION: What exactly is hot viewpoint? How is it different from other types of viewpoint?

Hot viewpoint is about the viewpoint character's emotional reaction to what is happening. Hot viewpoint is full of sensual details, strong emotions, and important/dangerous/violent actions. Most hot viewpoint moments are action scenes full of adrenaline, love scenes, or physical or emotional fight scenes which can include an argument between characters.  


Cold viewpoint has almost no emotion involved. It’s a simple recital of facts or what’s happening.


Warm viewpoint is halfway between them with emotions of importance, but not extreme importance.


Examples:


COLD: Pamela glanced at the doors' numbers as she passed them. Room 82 should be just ahead.


WARM: Pamela smiled as she glanced at the hotel room number.  Tom said he's be in Room 82.  He'd promised her champagne, roses, and a night of passion. A night to remember.  She could hardly wait.


HOT:  The slight cheesy stench of the alien made Pamela's nose twitch as she leaned against the hallway wall.  Her hands were sweating so much she feared she'd drop the Colt she held in her right hand.  With a quick prayer for courage, she eased toward Room 82 then kicked in the door.


For a writer, it's not so important to know the difference in an intellectual way, but to understand it instinctively as we write. If we are inside the character and feel what she feels, we are more likely to get it right.

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Just Say No to Omniscient

On one of the blogs I follow, a reader asked about whether she should use omniscient viewpoint in her first chapter.  In omniscient viewpoint you read the thoughts of all or most of the characters' heads as well as get an overview of what is happening outside of the character viewpoint.  Here is my reply.

These days, people have so many ways to entertain themselves that reading has a hard time even being considered, let alone being in the top five of how someone wants to spend their down time and money.  As writers, we have to figure out why our stories should be part of that down time.  What does reading this story give that no other entertainment gives?  

Science has helped here by studying the brain activity of readers.  "Being there" is what readers want.  They want to be in the story and feel, see, taste and sense through character viewpoint.  The character's reactions make our brains experience the same thing, and this makes the brain and reader very happy.  Omniscient viewpoint's main target is the intellect which works for some readers, but it doesn't offer those wonderful I'm-there brain reactions a majority want.  

Another reason not to use omniscient is that newer writers suck at it, every single time.  It's a landscape of bad craft land mines that the ignorant writer skips happily through, blissfully unaware that the reader experience is being destroyed in his path.  Once the craft is master level after years of writing and the writer reaches excellence, he may decide omniscient POV should be tried.  Even then, he'll probably start a few chapters then go "Hell, no. This is tripe."  End of omniscient experience.  

As a writing teacher, I'm guessing that the real reason the question asker wants that fantasy first chapter as omniscient is she wants to info dump all her world building in one spot because she thinks the reader needs this pile of world building vomit NOW.  Spoiler alert:  They don't.  

So, listen to agents, editors, other authors, writing teachers, and readers, and just so no to omniscient.  

Monday, September 7, 2026

More than One Type of Viewpoint in a Story

QUESTION: I want to use first person point of view for my hero, and third person for my other characters. What do you think?


As a rule in popular fiction, you don't switch from first to third POV or vice versa.


Some writers have done this, but many readers and reviewers don't like this because they find it so jarring it knocks them out of the story.


This would be a particularly dangerous for a newer writer who doesn't have the experience and control to handle these changes or the reader's trust that they know what they are doing.


I can't suggest which type of POV to use. Only you can decide on that. Consider your comfort level with the different viewpoints, and the ease of telling the story with that POV. 


With first person, you must also be certain you can hear the main character's voice well enough to stay in that voice for the whole novel. It’s also extremely rare for a novel in first person to have more than one viewpoint character.  


If you do decide to write both first and third POV, you should have a very particular reason for it.  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Viewpoint in the Catacombs

 In a recent post I discussed how to write viewpoint in a battle.  I’ve never written a large battle of armies, but I’ve written a number of multi-person fight scenes.  Below is a scene from THE ONCE AND FUTURE QUEEN, a now out-of-print space opera.  My viewpoint character and hero is Captain Valerian Grant.  He and three of his ship’s crew have gone into the catacombs under the capital city to help locals find the kidnapped queen of the planet, and, yes, the locals use swords, and the catacombs are boobytrapped to kill anyone using high tech weapons.  

Notice how I switch back and forth in Val’s viewpoint from personal awareness to situational awareness of his group and their opponents.  This allowed me to show both what is happening to and around Val.  


After about ten minutes of travel, they reached a wider portion of tunnel where they could all walk almost abreast.  They fell into groups of two and moved more swiftly.  Prince Gregory came up beside Val, and they stayed close to Patrick at point.  Following behind, Smith and Adam kept a constant eye on their sensors.  Wadja guarded their rear.  

Patrick hissed a warning, but before Val could half unsheathe his sword, the enemy was on them from behind.  He tossed his lighted torch toward the wall to get it out of hand and from under foot, and brought the Lady's Sword out as someone huge, human, and armed with a sword materialized from the darkness in front of them and attacked.  

He had a bare moment to be aware his group was outnumbered and surrounded on both sides before he parried a blow from his opponent.  The swords clanged together, sparks flying in the half darkness.  

Recalling Adam had never handled a sword and couldn't use a stunner because of the booby traps, Val spun and kicked his opponent's groin.  He didn't have time to fight fair right now, but he'd apologize to the man's corpse later.  

The man bent double, and Val smashed him across the face with the hilt of his sword.  The man went down, and Val dodged his body as he studied the melee around him.  

Patrick and Gregory fought back to back a distance away in one of the widest sections of the tunnel.  Around them lay at least three wounded men, and they fought about four more.  From the ease in which they relied on each other and worked as one fighter, Val could tell that part of Gregory's training with Patrick had been for situations such as this.  Patrick's skill, which surpassed Gregory's, sparked a moment of speculation as Val searched for his own people.

With four wounded men at their perimeter, Wajda and Smith had their backs to the wall with Adam between them.  Wajda with his deadly skill struck and darted like a snake at the two men who harried him, but Smith who'd never had training in swords depended on her superior Pandori strength to combat her three more experienced opponents.  

She battered at them, and at each parried blow, the huge men staggered back under her brutal onslaught.  Over a foot shorter, she forced them into awkward blows while she took advantage of the angle of attack by striking at undefended areas.  One of her opponents was bloody across the lower chest and a second limped.

Adam, who had the wisdom to stay out of Wajda and Smith's way, employed his own great height by gigging and prodding the enemy with his sword.  It wasn't the prime way to fight with a sword, but the men who fought Smith and Wajda had Adam to contend with too, and several had bloody heads, and one of the wounded on the floor had an upper shoulder wound only a giant like Adam could have dealt.

Val wondered at his own unpopularity as an opponent since he'd attracted only one fighter, then decided he'd been separated from the others in the first rush of the enemy.  Careful to avoid the wounded who still had enough life to be dangerous, he advanced toward Wajda and Smith. He shouted a Viking cry he'd learned from Adam.

As the catacombs echoed with the frightening and demoralizing summons to battle, two fighters spun toward him.  Val crouched, letting them come to him away from his people, then he exploded at them.  

Visceral response and years of training took over and the next minutes became a blur of dodging and assaulting his two opponents who were both excellent fighters.  Apparently, the bad fighters had all been wounded in the first round of battle.

These two opponents were far too wily to let him pull the same trick he had on his first enemy so he bashed the hell out of them while he sought an opening in their defenses.  

Finally, the one to his left slipped on the damp catacomb stone.  As the man tottered, Val kicked him in the knee.  With a nasty but oddly satisfying crunch, the kneecap broke, and the man fainted, falling toward the other swordsman.

His other opponent dodged and stumbled.  Val swung his sword like a ball bat toward the man's throat.  The man's head tumbled off his shoulders like a lopsided ball, then the body crashed down.  

Val sidestepped the head and body to avoid the slippery, gushing blood.  In the dancing light of the dropped torches, the catacomb tunnel was littered with bodies and wounded, and around him, he could hear moans of pain and cursing.  He counted important intact heads.  

Patrick and Gregory, surrounded by fallen bodies, stood where they'd fought, and Patrick stanched a wound on Gregory's right forearm while keeping an eye out for enemy.  

Adam's blond hair shown in the half light as he bent toward Wajda who, standing, held his bleeding upper left shoulder, and Smith towered before them at guard.  Her fine head fur bristled on end, her teeth bared in defense posture, she watched the fallen enemy and the passages to either side.

With a wordless, heartfelt prayer of thanks for everyone's safety after being attacked three to one, Val grinned and blew the Pandori female a kiss, then with his sword at ready, he made his way through the wounded and bodies toward Patrick and Gregory. 


Monday, August 24, 2026

Avoiding Scams and Bad Publishers

 Here’s an excellent article from former agent Nathan Bransford on the various scams and nonsense authors are dealing with right now.  



https://nathanbransford.com/blog/2026/08/know-your-rights-as-an-author 

Monday, August 17, 2026

Viewpoint in Battle.

 QUESTION:  I want to write an overview of what is happening during battle.  How do I do this?


One of the choices an author makes is what kind of viewpoint to use.  In a novel like a fantasy with lots of action, the advantage of using an omniscient viewpoint is that you can give an overview of a big battle.  The disadvantage is that all immediacy is lost because you aren’t in your main character’s head.  Readers today prefer the immediacy of third or first person viewpoint because they want to feel what the character feels, see what he sees, etc.  Omniscient is more cold, and closer to a camera watching the action.


You can’t switch back and forth between types of viewpoint at your convenience because doing this knocks the reader right out of the book, and that’s one thing you want to avoid at all costs.


If you use a single viewpoint in a big fight, you'll miss some of the action because one fighter can't see everything, but you'll have intensity.  If it is a long battle and you have more than one viewpoint character fighting, you can switch to the other viewpoint character in another scene. 


If you want the reader to know about what’s going on in the big battle, you can have your character end up on a hill above the fight so he can see how the battle is going, or he can talk to another character who relays this information.  


Study novels you've enjoyed where the novelist has really drawn you in during scenes like this.  Seeing how he/she did it is a master's class in writing. 


One particular writer who does great fight scenes and battles is Ilona Andrews who wrote the urban fantasy series about Kate Daniels.  It is set in modern times, but the weapons are often swords, etc.  The author is a husband and wife team, and the husband is ex-military, and it really shows in the fight scenes.

Monday, August 10, 2026

Making a Fight Scene Seem Real

QUESTION: I'm writing a fight scene, and I'm having a horrible time making it real. I've never hit anyone or been hit. How do I make it real?


That's a good question. If the scene and actions don't seem real to you, you can't make it real to the reader.


One way to make a fight real for you is to choreograph it by yourself or with the help of a friend or family member.


You play the hero and have the other person be his opponent. Don't just figure out the blows and what the other person will be doing. 


Imagine yourself hitting that person. What are you feeling? Where would your hand hit? How would that feel to you? 


If your hero is a trained fighter, how would his feelings differ?


Imagine how it would sound. To do this, hit your fist hard against your other hand and listen. 


Also ask friends if they have ever hit someone and how did it feel?


You may never have been hit, but you have been hurt. Remember how it felt when you were hit in the face while you were trying to diaper a rowdy toddler who clobbered you with his foot.  Or that baseball that hit you in the face or chest. Increase the sensation, and you've got some idea of what it feels like to be hit in a fight.